New Mexico
U.S. Senate
Incumbent on the ballot
Forecast as of November 1, 2026. Every share and vote figure on this page is that forecast, added up from the counties below. Not a poll average, not ballots cast, and not an official result.
Why this race matters
This is the 20th closest Senate race in the forecast, 14.9 points, out of 35.
35 Senate races are on the 2026 ballot in this forecast (15 Democratic leads, 20 Republican leads). Seats that are not on the ballot are not assigned, so this is not a 100-seat chamber.
No earlier forecast of this race is archived, so there is no previous projection, date, or reason to show.
History block in the model: D+14.4. That is the office blend, not one past election.
Last same-office result in the candidate file: 2024 D+10.1. A special on the 2026 ballot is not automatically that contest.
Polling block: D+17.7. The published result is still the county sum.
Counties
Projected vote by county. Tap a county to open its precincts.
Drawing the counties.
DBen Ray Luján, DBen Ray Luján
Democratic · Incumbent
Larry Marker
Republican
Other
Margin
D+14.9
Win probability
99.9%
80% interval
D+20.9 to D+8.8
95% interval
D+24.0 to D+5.6
Market
98%
Ben Ray Luján · win probability, not a vote shareRaw data Checking polls.
50,000 draws. The 80% interval is the 10th to the 90th percentile. The 95% interval is the 2.5th to the 97.5th. The thin mark is the 95% interval. The thick mark is the 80%. The hairline is zero. 697,012 projected votes, equal to the table. Not ballots cast.
Counties
Every reporting unit in the race. Tap a county to open its precincts. The projected votes above are this table added up. They are not ballots cast.
| Party | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bernalillo County | DBen Ray Luján, DBen Ray Luján | D | D+26.7 | 62.2% | 240,075 |
| Doña Ana County | DBen Ray Luján, DBen Ray Luján | D | D+18.1 | 57.9% | 65,963 |
| Santa Fe County | DBen Ray Luján, DBen Ray Luján | D | D+54.6 | 76.2% | 64,659 |
| Sandoval County | DBen Ray Luján, DBen Ray Luján | D | D+12.3 | 55.0% | 61,431 |
| San Juan County | RLarry Marker, RLarry Marker | R | R+22.5 | 60.1% | 40,877 |
| Valencia County | RLarry Marker, RLarry Marker | R | R+2.5 | 50.1% | 25,701 |
| McKinley County | DBen Ray Luján, DBen Ray Luján | D | D+39.5 | 68.6% | 19,978 |
| Otero County | RLarry Marker, RLarry Marker | R | R+18.5 | 58.1% | 18,723 |
| Eddy County | RLarry Marker, RLarry Marker | R | R+40.3 | 69.0% | 18,129 |
| Chaves County | RLarry Marker, RLarry Marker | R | R+32.3 | 65.0% | 17,146 |
| Lea County | RLarry Marker, RLarry Marker | R | R+50.3 | 74.0% | 16,380 |
| Taos County | DBen Ray Luján, DBen Ray Luján | D | D+56.4 | 77.0% | 12,849 |
| Rio Arriba County | DBen Ray Luján, DBen Ray Luján | D | D+36.9 | 67.3% | 12,349 |
| Curry County | RLarry Marker, RLarry Marker | R | R+35.8 | 66.8% | 11,757 |
| Grant County | DBen Ray Luján, DBen Ray Luján | D | D+16.6 | 57.2% | 10,985 |
| Los Alamos County | DBen Ray Luján, DBen Ray Luján | D | D+30.3 | 64.0% | 9,413 |
| San Miguel County | DBen Ray Luján, DBen Ray Luján | D | D+43.6 | 70.7% | 6,220 |
| Lincoln County | RLarry Marker, RLarry Marker | R | R+28.6 | 63.2% | 5,692 |
| Cibola County | DBen Ray Luján, DBen Ray Luján | D | D+17.3 | 57.5% | 5,546 |
| Luna County | RLarry Marker, RLarry Marker | R | R+2.6 | 50.1% | 4,978 |
| Socorro County | DBen Ray Luján, DBen Ray Luján | D | D+12.4 | 55.0% | 4,469 |
| Torrance County | RLarry Marker, RLarry Marker | R | R+22.9 | 60.3% | 4,020 |
| Roosevelt County | RLarry Marker, RLarry Marker | R | R+35.6 | 66.6% | 3,718 |
| Sierra County | RLarry Marker, RLarry Marker | R | R+9.6 | 53.6% | 3,678 |
| Colfax County | DBen Ray Luján, DBen Ray Luján | D | D+1.3 | 49.5% | 3,591 |
| Quay County | RLarry Marker, RLarry Marker | R | R+28.3 | 63.0% | 2,074 |
| Mora County | DBen Ray Luján, DBen Ray Luján | D | D+35.3 | 66.5% | 1,392 |
| Catron County | RLarry Marker, RLarry Marker | R | R+39.4 | 68.6% | 1,320 |
| Hidalgo County | RLarry Marker, RLarry Marker | R | R+4.5 | 51.1% | 1,151 |
| Guadalupe County | DBen Ray Luján, DBen Ray Luján | D | D+27.6 | 62.7% | 1,085 |
| Union County | RLarry Marker, RLarry Marker | R | R+45.1 | 71.4% | 933 |
| De Baca County | RLarry Marker, RLarry Marker | R | R+28.6 | 63.2% | 489 |
| Harding County | RLarry Marker, RLarry Marker | R | R+21.2 | 59.3% | 241 |
Model
- Raw data
2024 presidential baseline
National R−D 1.5County presidential file. Not the 2026 result.
- Raw data
Generic ballot
D 51.7 R 43.1 R−D -8.6National Wikipedia aggregate, 2026-10-30. State generic ballots, where a public poll exists, are mixed with the national swing for a race that does not have its own poll: ME, MI, NH, NY, OH. A state with no generic-ballot poll keeps the national swing and is not assigned a neighbor's.
- Raw data
Party identification
Pew D+5 and Gallup D+10, blend R−D -7.3Pew NPORS 2026, identifiers plus leaners: Republican 43, Democratic 48. Gallup party identification plus leaners, first two quarters of 2026: Democratic 49, Republican 39. Pew is 55% of this blend and Gallup is 45%.
- Model input
National block
R−D -8.160% generic ballot and 40% party identification. The swing versus the 2024 presidential margin is what gets transmitted.
- Model input
Swing transmitted
0.40 × -9.5 = -3.8This race has its own poll. The swing in the history blocks, before they shrink toward that poll, is the national block minus the 2024 presidential margin. Elasticity is shrunk halfway toward 1.
- Model input
History block
R−D -14.4Weights 2018 40 / 2024 35 / 2020 20 / 2022 5. If that office was on the ballot in 2022, that year takes the 40 and 2018 takes the 5. Otherwise 2018 keeps the 40. A missing year is filled with the 2020 result for the same office. Another office is not used. The year lines are Bernalillo County, the largest county, not the state total: 2018 D+32.4 w40, 2024 D+22.8 w35, 2020 D+21.1 w20, 2022 from 2020 D+21.1 w5. The state number above is the vote-weighted sum. A 2024 county map is not copied forward unchanged.
- Model input
Electorate block
R−D -17.6History reweighted by usual midterm turnout, plus half of the transmitted swing. Rural and presidential-only counties still move farther when the result is spread back to counties. That spread is ballot size, not the demographic file. Published ballots are the 2018 midterm canvass for this office, split by these modeled shares. They are not the 2024 presidential vote. The 2026 early-vote count is not inside this margin.
- Model input
Turnout block
R−D -16.3Each county is weighted by its 2018 ballots divided by its 2024 presidential ballots. Small counties shrink halfway toward the state median. 2020 mail shares are not used.
- Model input
National environment
R−D -18.0History plus the full transmitted swing. With no poll of this race, that swing is the state generic ballot mixed with the national block, or the national block alone.
- Model input
State environment
R−D -16.7History plus 45 percent of the transmitted swing. This is a Senate and governor weight.
- Model input
State partisan lean
R−D -6.0The 2024 presidential margin of this state, or of this district for a House race. It is heavier than the old state-environment block and is not shrunk toward the polling term.
- Model input
Trump popularity
R−D -10.9New York Times approval average, October 29, 2026: 37.4% approve, 60.2% disapprove. Net approval -22.800000000000004. That is not a vote share. Four-tenths of the net is a margin, then scaled by this place's partisan lean (factor 1.20), so an unpopular president costs more in a Democratic state.
- Model input
Candidate favorability
R−D 0.0Ben Ray Luján has no earlier race for this office in the file. Another candidate's margin is not their favorability.
- Model input
Demographics
R−D -18.6One statewide block only. A county that is more college-educated or more nonwhite than the other counties in this race takes more of the transmitted swing, and a more rural county takes less. That changes this block, at its weight. It does not choose which counties move when the margin is spread back out. That spread uses ballot size. The shares are the 2012–2016 American Community Survey and the 2010 Census, from the 2018 county election-context file. Alaska is not in that file.
- Model input
Finance
R−D -15.6No sourced spending edge. The block is history, or history shrunk toward the poll. It is not a finance model.
- Model input
Issues
R−D -15.6No sourced issue score. Same treatment as finance. It is not a separate issue model.
- Model input
Polling
R−D -17.7Individual polls -16.9 (80%) and the Wikipedia average -16.8 (20%). Named support R−D -16.6. Allocated support R−D -16.9. Named support does not move. Only the undecided line is split, 48.5% Republican and 51.5% Democratic. That is the 2024 two-party Republican share 46.9 moved halfway to 50 and capped at 60/40. A minor-party line is not published as its own candidate. Banned individual rows excluded: 0. One same-office miss, 2024: the poll was R−D -8.1 and the result was -10.1, miss -2.0. A single cycle is noisy, so 40 percent is kept. It is added to the polling term only. It is not a separate weight. Applied to the polling term: -0.80. Public pollsters: 2. Outliers: 0. Recency half-life 16 days. Sample weight n/(n+350). A registered-voter poll is 0.90. An internal poll, or a poll sponsored by one party, is weighted 0. It is not in the average. An internal-only file is dropped. A poll that names both parties is not an internal. A poll more than 8 points from the median of the others is cut in half. Pollster quality nudges that weight by only a few percent. The same rule is used on a House poll. House district polls are likely-voter polls only.
- Model input
Generic ballot weight
R−D -18.5The generic ballot stays in the blend next to the independent polls. It is not shrunk toward the poll and an internal does not replace it. Weight 9.5%.
- Model input
Top line
Not a House termSenate and governor are the top line. They are not moved by themselves.
- Model input
Candidate
D+1.50 added wholeBen Ray Luján keeps the incumbent term of 1.5 after shrinkage. Overperformance is a separate term and is not added again here. No earlier race for this incumbent in this office. These points are not watered down to the candidate weight. The candidate weight is a separate slice of the baseline. On a Senate or governor race with three public polls and no outlier, the points stop at that poll instead of moving past it.
- Model input
Scandal
NoneNo candidate on this ballot is scandal-defined.
- Model input
Endorsements
NoneNo sourced endorsement on this ballot.
- Model input
Halfway floor
Not appliedNot applied. The state's 2024 presidential margin was inside 10 points, or there is no polling term.
- Model input
Pooling
35% of the way from each history block toward the polling termOtherwise the shrink is 35%.
- Model input
Prediction market
98% win probabilityBen Ray Luján 98.2% is a win probability, not a vote share. Republican win probability 1.8 from Polymarket 1.8% Republican. A price of 50 is a tie. Each point above 50 is 0.35 margin points, capped at 12, so the raw margin is -12.0. That margin is shrunk 40% toward the pre-market margin -14.8, which leaves -13.1. It enters once, at 5.0%. The polling term is not nudged. Books under $10,000 and primary markets are ignored.
- Model input
State bend
NoneNot applied.
- Model input
State environment adjustment
R−D -0.3The 2022 statewide margin was R−D -6.4 and the 2024 presidential margin was R−D -6.0. The country moved 1.4 from that presidential vote to the 2022 House vote. Fifteen percent of the difference is kept, capped at 1.5, so the state environment is -0.3 on top of the national swing.
- Model input
Early vote
NoneNo early-vote adjustment. The state has no usable same-day comparison and no county file that covers the state.
- Model input
Other ratings
R−D -11.5 at 3.0%Cook, Sabato, Inside Elections, and the other columns on the same published tables (Decision Desk HQ, RealClearPolitics, Split Ticket, FiftyPlusOne, The Economist, Fox News, Silver Bulletin). 10 ratings, average R−D -11.5. A toss-up is 0, tilt 1.5, lean 3.5, likely 7, safe or solid 12. If this race is already further to that side, the rating does not pull it back. Mixed in after everything else, at 3.0 percent. It does not replace the poll. A seat nobody has rated is left alone.
- Model input
Weights
polling 20.7% · generic 8.8% · stateLean 14.1% · trump 9.4% · favorability 8.7% · history 6.3% · candidate 4.7% · national 4.7% · electorate 3.9% · stateEnv 3.1% · turnout 2.3% · demographics 2.3% · finance 1.6% · issues 1.7% · market 4.9% · ratings 3.0%History is lighter. State partisan lean, Trump popularity, and candidate favorability are their own terms. A market, when it qualifies, scales every other weight and is not taken out of polling alone. Published ratings, when a race has them, are mixed in after that. They are not taken out of polling alone.
County-sum margin
-14.9This is the sum of the county projections. Counties are not moved afterward to force this total.
Minor parties
NoneOther is the 2024 presidential vote that was neither Democratic nor Republican, weighted by these counties. It is not the last forecast. A missing opponent is not Other. No Libertarian, Green, Constitution, or other minor line was on this ballot.
80% interval
-20.9 to -8.810th to 90th percentile of 50,000 draws. Poll, national, state, turnout, and candidate error.
95% interval
-24.0 to -5.62.5th to 97.5th percentile. Senate and governor state errors in the same state share a correlation of 0.30. The band shown is the marginal interval.
Wikipedia, 2026 United States Senate elections (general-election infobox, checked against the state narrative) www.rdrnews.com/news/local/lujan-will-mount-reelection-bid-for-u-s-senate/article_5a3deb3f-aaa5-4cdc-83e0-86125444c3fc.html