Kansas
U.S. Senate
Incumbent on the ballot
Forecast as of October 7, 2026. These vote totals equal the sum of the counties below. Not a poll average.
RRoger Marshall, RRoger Marshall
Republican · Incumbent
Adam Hamilton
Democratic
Other
Margin
R+6.2
Win probability
77.3%
80% interval
D+4.5 to R+16.9
95% interval
D+10.2 to R+22.6
Market
64%
Roger Marshall · win probability, not a vote shareRaw data Checking polls.
The office baseline and the polling term disagree by more than 8 points, so the interval is widened. The market and the polls disagree by more than 15 points of win probability, so the market weight is cut in half and the interval is widened. The thin mark is the 95% interval. The thick mark is the 80%. The hairline is zero. 1,041,627 ballots, equal to the table.
Counties
Every reporting unit in the race. Sort any column. The votes above are this table added up.
| Party | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Johnson County | Adam Hamilton | D | D+17.1 | 57.7% | 275,024 |
| Sedgwick County | Roger Marshall | R | R+5.2 | 51.7% | 171,322 |
| Shawnee County | Adam Hamilton | D | D+9.1 | 53.7% | 65,455 |
| Douglas County | Adam Hamilton | D | D+46.6 | 72.4% | 46,433 |
| Wyandotte County | Adam Hamilton | D | D+32.5 | 65.3% | 40,482 |
| Leavenworth County | Roger Marshall | R | R+14.1 | 56.2% | 29,238 |
| Butler County | Roger Marshall | R | R+32.6 | 65.4% | 25,789 |
| Reno County | Roger Marshall | R | R+25.9 | 62.0% | 21,552 |
| Riley County | Adam Hamilton | D | D+10.4 | 54.3% | 19,450 |
| Saline County | Roger Marshall | R | R+23.0 | 60.6% | 18,581 |
| Miami County | Roger Marshall | R | R+30.9 | 64.5% | 14,948 |
| Crawford County | Roger Marshall | R | R+16.6 | 57.4% | 13,067 |
| Harvey County | Roger Marshall | R | R+12.4 | 55.3% | 12,869 |
| McPherson County | Roger Marshall | R | R+32.5 | 65.3% | 11,283 |
| Ellis County | Roger Marshall | R | R+37.5 | 67.8% | 10,809 |
| Cowley County | Roger Marshall | R | R+31.7 | 64.9% | 10,804 |
| Pottawatomie County | Roger Marshall | R | R+39.0 | 68.6% | 10,778 |
| Lyon County | Roger Marshall | R | R+6.1 | 52.1% | 10,605 |
| Franklin County | Roger Marshall | R | R+31.5 | 64.8% | 10,166 |
| Montgomery County | Roger Marshall | R | R+42.4 | 70.3% | 9,953 |
| Finney County | Roger Marshall | R | R+26.1 | 62.1% | 8,626 |
| Barton County | Roger Marshall | R | R+48.1 | 73.2% | 8,456 |
| Sumner County | Roger Marshall | R | R+41.5 | 69.8% | 8,439 |
| Jefferson County | Roger Marshall | R | R+28.3 | 63.2% | 7,942 |
| Geary County | Roger Marshall | R | R+9.0 | 53.6% | 7,330 |
| Dickinson County | Roger Marshall | R | R+46.3 | 72.3% | 7,315 |
| Cherokee County | Roger Marshall | R | R+44.3 | 71.3% | 6,974 |
| Ford County | Roger Marshall | R | R+29.7 | 64.0% | 6,579 |
| Labette County | Roger Marshall | R | R+29.6 | 63.9% | 6,337 |
| Osage County | Roger Marshall | R | R+39.4 | 68.8% | 6,314 |
| Atchison County | Roger Marshall | R | R+28.7 | 63.5% | 5,804 |
| Neosho County | Roger Marshall | R | R+39.5 | 68.8% | 5,427 |
| Bourbon County | Roger Marshall | R | R+45.5 | 71.9% | 5,258 |
| Jackson County | Roger Marshall | R | R+34.0 | 66.1% | 5,179 |
| Marion County | Roger Marshall | R | R+40.5 | 69.3% | 4,696 |
| Nemaha County | Roger Marshall | R | R+58.4 | 78.3% | 4,496 |
| Allen County | Roger Marshall | R | R+37.5 | 67.9% | 4,480 |
| Linn County | Roger Marshall | R | R+56.0 | 77.1% | 4,013 |
| Marshall County | Roger Marshall | R | R+40.5 | 69.3% | 3,974 |
| Seward County | Roger Marshall | R | R+30.3 | 64.3% | 3,652 |
| Coffey County | Roger Marshall | R | R+47.0 | 72.6% | 3,502 |
| Brown County | Roger Marshall | R | R+39.3 | 68.7% | 3,406 |
| Clay County | Roger Marshall | R | R+46.9 | 72.5% | 3,290 |
| Pratt County | Roger Marshall | R | R+42.8 | 70.5% | 3,266 |
| Cloud County | Roger Marshall | R | R+51.9 | 75.0% | 3,238 |
| Rice County | Roger Marshall | R | R+48.1 | 73.1% | 3,173 |
| Kingman County | Roger Marshall | R | R+51.3 | 74.8% | 3,158 |
| Wabaunsee County | Roger Marshall | R | R+40.2 | 69.2% | 3,069 |
| Anderson County | Roger Marshall | R | R+51.2 | 74.7% | 3,033 |
| Thomas County | Roger Marshall | R | R+57.1 | 77.7% | 2,931 |
| Wilson County | Roger Marshall | R | R+53.7 | 76.0% | 2,882 |
| Doniphan County | Roger Marshall | R | R+54.9 | 76.6% | 2,862 |
| Russell County | Roger Marshall | R | R+47.2 | 72.7% | 1,915 |
| Mitchell County | Roger Marshall | R | R+51.5 | 74.8% | 1,840 |
| Ottawa County | Roger Marshall | R | R+52.4 | 75.3% | 1,742 |
| Greenwood County | Roger Marshall | R | R+46.8 | 72.5% | 1,673 |
| Morris County | Roger Marshall | R | R+32.4 | 65.3% | 1,619 |
| Ellsworth County | Roger Marshall | R | R+38.1 | 68.1% | 1,600 |
| Phillips County | Roger Marshall | R | R+59.5 | 78.8% | 1,593 |
| Washington County | Roger Marshall | R | R+55.0 | 76.6% | 1,566 |
| Pawnee County | Roger Marshall | R | R+37.4 | 67.8% | 1,552 |
| Sherman County | Roger Marshall | R | R+54.6 | 76.4% | 1,504 |
| Harper County | Roger Marshall | R | R+49.9 | 74.0% | 1,482 |
| Rooks County | Roger Marshall | R | R+57.1 | 77.6% | 1,470 |
| Republic County | Roger Marshall | R | R+51.6 | 74.9% | 1,417 |
| Norton County | Roger Marshall | R | R+53.5 | 75.9% | 1,317 |
| Grant County | Roger Marshall | R | R+48.8 | 73.5% | 1,288 |
| Gray County | Roger Marshall | R | R+54.8 | 76.5% | 1,272 |
| Barber County | Roger Marshall | R | R+58.0 | 78.1% | 1,259 |
| Scott County | Roger Marshall | R | R+60.6 | 79.4% | 1,238 |
| Smith County | Roger Marshall | R | R+54.3 | 76.3% | 1,163 |
| Stafford County | Roger Marshall | R | R+49.8 | 74.0% | 1,107 |
| Stevens County | Roger Marshall | R | R+61.4 | 79.8% | 1,064 |
| Osborne County | Roger Marshall | R | R+54.4 | 76.3% | 1,029 |
| Meade County | Roger Marshall | R | R+55.4 | 76.8% | 983 |
| Rush County | Roger Marshall | R | R+51.3 | 74.8% | 931 |
| Trego County | Roger Marshall | R | R+56.8 | 77.5% | 920 |
| Jewell County | Roger Marshall | R | R+61.7 | 80.0% | 913 |
| Chautauqua County | Roger Marshall | R | R+57.1 | 77.7% | 886 |
| Lincoln County | Roger Marshall | R | R+51.0 | 74.6% | 874 |
| Woodson County | Roger Marshall | R | R+47.1 | 72.6% | 873 |
| Chase County | Roger Marshall | R | R+36.7 | 67.5% | 848 |
| Decatur County | Roger Marshall | R | R+54.8 | 76.5% | 842 |
| Cheyenne County | Roger Marshall | R | R+54.8 | 76.5% | 825 |
| Rawlins County | Roger Marshall | R | R+58.4 | 78.3% | 814 |
| Logan County | Roger Marshall | R | R+57.5 | 77.8% | 812 |
| Gove County | Roger Marshall | R | R+63.1 | 80.6% | 810 |
| Sheridan County | Roger Marshall | R | R+66.1 | 82.2% | 796 |
| Ness County | Roger Marshall | R | R+64.9 | 81.5% | 791 |
| Elk County | Roger Marshall | R | R+55.4 | 76.8% | 776 |
| Kearny County | Roger Marshall | R | R+54.2 | 76.2% | 755 |
| Graham County | Roger Marshall | R | R+51.5 | 74.8% | 746 |
| Haskell County | Roger Marshall | R | R+50.3 | 74.2% | 741 |
| Edwards County | Roger Marshall | R | R+51.2 | 74.7% | 736 |
| Kiowa County | Roger Marshall | R | R+57.3 | 77.7% | 642 |
| Morton County | Roger Marshall | R | R+59.2 | 78.7% | 615 |
| Clark County | Roger Marshall | R | R+58.7 | 78.4% | 588 |
| Hodgeman County | Roger Marshall | R | R+56.4 | 77.3% | 560 |
| Comanche County | Roger Marshall | R | R+54.0 | 76.1% | 507 |
| Wichita County | Roger Marshall | R | R+59.3 | 78.8% | 499 |
| Lane County | Roger Marshall | R | R+56.9 | 77.5% | 489 |
| Hamilton County | Roger Marshall | R | R+52.0 | 75.1% | 473 |
| Wallace County | Roger Marshall | R | R+70.5 | 84.3% | 434 |
| Stanton County | Roger Marshall | R | R+49.4 | 73.8% | 385 |
| Greeley County | Roger Marshall | R | R+59.3 | 78.8% | 344 |
Model
- Raw data
2024 presidential baseline
National R−D 1.5County presidential file. Not the 2026 result.
- Raw data
Generic ballot
D 50.8 R 42.6 R−D -8.2National Wikipedia aggregate, October 5, 2026. State generic ballots, where a public poll exists, replace a uniform national swing: ME, MI, NH, NY, OH. A state with no generic-ballot poll keeps the national number and is not assigned a neighbor's.
- Raw data
Party identification
Pew D+5 and Gallup D+10, blend R−D -7.3Pew NPORS 2026, identifiers plus leaners: Republican 43, Democratic 48. Gallup party identification plus leaners, first two quarters of 2026: Democratic 49, Republican 39. Pew is 55% of this blend and Gallup is 45%.
- Model input
National block
R−D -7.860% generic ballot and 40% party identification. The swing versus the 2024 presidential margin is what gets transmitted.
- Model input
Swing transmitted
1.07 × -9.3 = -9.9Only the share of the national swing this state took in the last midterm is transmitted. Elasticity is shrunk halfway toward 1.
- Raw data
2026 early vote
None reportedNo verified 2026 returned-mail or in-person ballots for this state in the October 7 file. Nothing was imputed. Day-1 early vote is a signal, not a statewide margin. Applications and ballots that were only sent are not in this count. A day-1 pace gap is not a statewide margin.
- Model input
History block
R−D 15.0Weights 2018 5 / 2024 35 / 2020 20 / 2022 40. 2020 and 2022 results for this office are included in every state that had those races, including blowouts. A 2022 election is weighted ahead of 2018. If that office was not on the ballot, the 2020 result for the same office fills the year. Another office is not used. 2018 from 2020 R+41.5 w5, 2024 from 2020 R+41.5 w35, 2020 R+41.5 w20, 2022 R+53.0 w40. This is the last result for the office, not the presidential margin. A 2024 county map is not copied forward unchanged. A 2018 model error is not used.
- Model input
Electorate block
R−D 5.9History reweighted by usual midterm turnout, plus half of the transmitted swing. Rural and presidential-only counties still move farther when the result is spread back to counties. The 2026 early-vote count is not inside this margin.
- Model input
Turnout block
R−D 9.1Each county is weighted by its 2018 ballots divided by its 2024 presidential ballots. Small counties shrink halfway toward the state median. 2020 mail shares are not used. No verified 2026 returned-mail or in-person ballots for this state in the October 7 file. Nothing was imputed. Day-1 early vote is a signal, not a statewide margin.
- Model input
National environment
R−D 2.9History plus the full transmitted swing from the 60/40 national block.
- Model input
State environment
R−D 6.5History plus 45% of the transmitted swing.
- Model input
State partisan lean
R−D 16.1The 2024 presidential margin of this state, or of this district for a House race. It is heavier than the old state-environment block and is not shrunk toward the polling term.
- Model input
Trump popularity
R−D -4.3New York Times approval average, October 7, 2026: 37% approve, 60% disapprove. Net approval -23. That is not a vote share. Four-tenths of the net is a margin, then scaled by this place's partisan lean (factor 0.46), so an unpopular president costs more in a Democratic state.
- Model input
Candidate favorability
R−D -0.4Roger Marshall's record minus this place's partisan lean is D+1.1. Thirty-five percent of that gap, capped at 5, is the favorability term, D+0.4. The old margin is not reused.
- Model input
Demographics
R−D 1.0County college, rural, and nonwhite shares from the 2018 election-context file change how much of the swing a county takes. No separate microdata file.
- Model input
Finance
R−D 9.4No sourced spending edge, so the block starts on history. With a poll, it shrinks toward the polling term with the other non-poll blocks.
- Model input
Issues
R−D 9.4No sourced issue score. Same treatment as finance.
- Model input
Polling
R−D -1.2Individual polls -1.3 (80%) and the Wikipedia average -0.6 (20%). Named support R−D -1.5. Allocated support R−D -1.2. Named support does not move. Only the undecided line is split, 54.1% Republican and 45.9% Democratic. That is the 2024 two-party Republican share 58.2 moved halfway to 50 and capped at 60/40. A named third-party vote stays third-party. Banned individual rows excluded: 1. State miss shrunk 40% toward zero: 0.00. Public pollsters: 3. Outliers: 0. Recency half-life 16 days. Sample weight n/(n+350). A registered-voter poll is 0.90. An internal poll, or a poll sponsored by one party, is weighted 0.20, and only when a public poll is also in the race. An internal-only file is dropped. A poll that names both parties is not an internal. A poll more than 8 points from the median of the others is cut in half.
- Model input
Candidate
R+1.50 reaches the resultRoger Marshall keeps the incumbent term of 1.5 after shrinkage. Overperformance is a separate term and is not added again here. Roger Marshall's 2020 race is already in the history block, so it is not applied again.
- Model input
Halfway floor
Not appliedNot applied. At least three public polls from different pollsters, and none is an outlier.
- Model input
Pooling
35% of the way from each history block toward the polling termOtherwise the shrink is 35%.
- Model input
Prediction market
64% win probabilityRoger Marshall 63.8% is a win probability, not a vote share. Republican win probability 63.8 from Kalshi 63.5% Republican; Polymarket 64.0% Republican. A price of 50 is a tie. Each point above 50 is 0.35 margin points, capped at 12, so the raw margin is 4.8. That margin is shrunk 40% toward the pre-market margin 6.2, which leaves 5.4. It enters once, at 2.5%. The polling term is not nudged. The market and the polls differ by more than 15 points of win probability, so the weight is half of 5% and the interval is wider.
- Model input
State bend
NoneNot applied.
- Model input
Weights
polling 21.0% · history 7.6% · candidate 5.8% · electorate 4.8% · national 5.8% · stateEnv 3.8% · turnout 2.8% · demographics 2.8% · finance 2.0% · issues 2.0% · stateLean 17.3% · trump 11.5% · favorability 10.5% · market 2.5%History is lighter. State partisan lean, Trump popularity, and candidate favorability are their own terms. A market, when it qualifies, scales every other weight and is not taken out of polling alone.
County-sum margin
6.2This is the sum of the reporting units after each unit moved off its own history. It is not the poll average.
80% interval
-4.5 to 16.910th to 90th percentile of 50,000 draws. Poll, national, state, turnout, and candidate error.
95% interval
-10.2 to 22.62.5th to 97.5th percentile. Senate and governor state errors in the same state share a correlation of 0.30. The band shown is the marginal interval.
Wikipedia, 2026 United States Senate elections (general-election infobox, checked against the state narrative) fox4kc.com/politics/your-local-election-headquarters/senator-roger-marshall-plans-to-run-for-reelection/