Iowa
U.S. Senate
Open seat
Forecast as of October 7, 2026. These vote totals equal the sum of the counties below. Not a poll average.
RAshley Hinson, RAshley Hinson
Republican
DJosh Turek, DJosh Turek
Democratic
Other
Margin
R+1.1
Win probability
59.5%
80% interval
D+5.0 to R+7.2
95% interval
D+8.2 to R+10.4
Market
55%
Ashley Hinson · win probability, not a vote shareRaw data Checking polls.
50,000 draws. The 80% interval is the 10th to the 90th percentile. The 95% interval is the 2.5th to the 97.5th. The thin mark is the 95% interval. The thick mark is the 80%. The hairline is zero. 1,267,692 ballots, equal to the table.
Counties
Every reporting unit in the race. Sort any column. The votes above are this table added up.
| Party | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polk County | Josh Turek | D | D+21.2 | 59.9% | 204,450 |
| Linn County | Josh Turek | D | D+20.2 | 59.4% | 97,895 |
| Scott County | Josh Turek | D | D+6.4 | 52.5% | 71,794 |
| Johnson County | Josh Turek | D | D+48.4 | 73.5% | 68,854 |
| Black Hawk County | Josh Turek | D | D+11.5 | 55.0% | 50,122 |
| Dallas County | Josh Turek | D | D+5.5 | 52.1% | 50,106 |
| Dubuque County | Josh Turek | D | D+1.7 | 50.2% | 42,053 |
| Story County | Josh Turek | D | D+20.7 | 59.6% | 39,360 |
| Pottawattamie County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+9.7 | 54.2% | 35,529 |
| Woodbury County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+12.7 | 55.7% | 34,139 |
| Warren County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+10.4 | 54.5% | 26,130 |
| Clinton County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+8.6 | 53.6% | 19,050 |
| Cerro Gordo County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+1.4 | 50.0% | 18,354 |
| Jasper County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+17.3 | 58.0% | 16,119 |
| Muscatine County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+4.6 | 51.6% | 15,756 |
| Marion County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+27.5 | 63.1% | 15,592 |
| Des Moines County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+4.8 | 51.7% | 15,198 |
| Sioux County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+60.8 | 79.7% | 15,105 |
| Marshall County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+5.3 | 52.0% | 13,774 |
| Webster County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+20.9 | 59.8% | 13,365 |
| Lee County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+17.5 | 58.1% | 12,923 |
| Boone County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+11.2 | 54.9% | 12,277 |
| Wapello County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+21.2 | 59.9% | 11,657 |
| Bremer County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+11.9 | 55.3% | 11,645 |
| Benton County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+22.9 | 60.8% | 11,576 |
| Plymouth County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+44.0 | 71.3% | 11,145 |
| Winneshiek County | Josh Turek | D | D+1.0 | 49.8% | 9,542 |
| Washington County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+14.1 | 56.4% | 9,241 |
| Dickinson County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+29.7 | 64.2% | 8,954 |
| Carroll County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+31.6 | 65.1% | 8,896 |
| Jones County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+16.0 | 57.3% | 8,759 |
| Mahaska County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+41.3 | 70.0% | 8,728 |
| Jackson County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+22.2 | 60.4% | 8,626 |
| Buchanan County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+17.9 | 58.3% | 8,571 |
| Cedar County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+11.5 | 55.1% | 8,499 |
| Delaware County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+29.3 | 64.0% | 8,090 |
| Madison County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+28.3 | 63.5% | 7,996 |
| Poweshiek County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+6.7 | 52.7% | 7,977 |
| Fayette County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+20.2 | 59.4% | 7,854 |
| Iowa County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+17.5 | 58.0% | 7,694 |
| Henry County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+25.7 | 62.2% | 7,659 |
| Clayton County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+24.2 | 61.4% | 7,505 |
| Tama County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+16.6 | 57.6% | 6,875 |
| Clay County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+32.9 | 65.8% | 6,811 |
| Hardin County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+28.1 | 63.4% | 6,747 |
| Kossuth County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+33.9 | 66.3% | 6,701 |
| Jefferson County | Josh Turek | D | D+3.5 | 51.1% | 6,654 |
| Mills County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+28.8 | 63.7% | 6,578 |
| Butler County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+35.1 | 66.8% | 6,422 |
| Harrison County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+27.7 | 63.2% | 4,604 |
| Floyd County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+12.9 | 55.8% | 4,423 |
| Hamilton County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+19.2 | 58.9% | 4,392 |
| Buena Vista County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+19.2 | 58.9% | 4,359 |
| O'Brien County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+46.8 | 72.7% | 4,351 |
| Allamakee County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+20.3 | 59.4% | 4,236 |
| Page County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+28.3 | 63.5% | 4,232 |
| Cass County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+26.6 | 62.6% | 4,173 |
| Grundy County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+27.7 | 63.2% | 4,136 |
| Lyon County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+55.7 | 77.2% | 4,051 |
| Crawford County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+29.4 | 64.0% | 3,784 |
| Guthrie County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+23.9 | 61.2% | 3,778 |
| Shelby County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+28.9 | 63.8% | 3,762 |
| Appanoose County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+32.6 | 65.6% | 3,750 |
| Chickasaw County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+23.1 | 60.9% | 3,613 |
| Cherokee County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+31.7 | 65.2% | 3,532 |
| Union County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+22.1 | 60.4% | 3,478 |
| Hancock County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+33.3 | 66.0% | 3,441 |
| Mitchell County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+17.0 | 57.8% | 3,339 |
| Wright County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+22.4 | 60.5% | 3,309 |
| Winnebago County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+16.6 | 57.6% | 3,264 |
| Sac County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+37.5 | 68.1% | 3,160 |
| Keokuk County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+37.5 | 68.0% | 2,982 |
| Louisa County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+26.9 | 62.7% | 2,979 |
| Calhoun County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+32.6 | 65.6% | 2,954 |
| Humboldt County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+35.9 | 67.3% | 2,939 |
| Montgomery County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+25.0 | 61.8% | 2,935 |
| Palo Alto County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+30.9 | 64.8% | 2,886 |
| Franklin County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+27.6 | 63.1% | 2,833 |
| Greene County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+18.9 | 58.8% | 2,827 |
| Howard County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+17.7 | 58.2% | 2,805 |
| Emmet County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+30.0 | 64.3% | 2,776 |
| Lucas County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+34.0 | 66.3% | 2,691 |
| Monona County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+31.3 | 65.0% | 2,677 |
| Clarke County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+28.0 | 63.3% | 2,586 |
| Worth County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+15.4 | 57.0% | 2,481 |
| Monroe County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+36.6 | 67.6% | 2,405 |
| Adair County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+30.9 | 64.8% | 2,357 |
| Davis County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+40.3 | 69.5% | 2,291 |
| Fremont County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+30.5 | 64.6% | 2,195 |
| Decatur County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+33.0 | 65.8% | 2,162 |
| Ida County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+39.3 | 69.0% | 2,112 |
| Van Buren County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+41.3 | 70.0% | 2,101 |
| Pocahontas County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+40.0 | 69.3% | 2,072 |
| Audubon County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+24.3 | 61.5% | 1,879 |
| Osceola County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+50.1 | 74.4% | 1,867 |
| Wayne County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+43.1 | 70.9% | 1,809 |
| Taylor County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+41.6 | 70.1% | 1,785 |
| Ringgold County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+37.2 | 67.9% | 1,556 |
| Adams County | Ashley Hinson | R | R+30.0 | 64.3% | 1,236 |
Model
- Raw data
2024 presidential baseline
National R−D 1.5County presidential file. Not the 2026 result.
- Raw data
Generic ballot
D 50.8 R 42.6 R−D -8.2National Wikipedia aggregate, October 5, 2026. State generic ballots, where a public poll exists, replace a uniform national swing: ME, MI, NH, NY, OH. A state with no generic-ballot poll keeps the national number and is not assigned a neighbor's.
- Raw data
Party identification
Pew D+5 and Gallup D+10, blend R−D -7.3Pew NPORS 2026, identifiers plus leaners: Republican 43, Democratic 48. Gallup party identification plus leaners, first two quarters of 2026: Democratic 49, Republican 39. Pew is 55% of this blend and Gallup is 45%.
- Model input
National block
R−D -7.860% generic ballot and 40% party identification. The swing versus the 2024 presidential margin is what gets transmitted.
- Model input
Swing transmitted
0.77 × -9.3 = -7.2Only the share of the national swing this state took in the last midterm is transmitted. Elasticity is shrunk halfway toward 1.
- Raw data
2026 early vote
None reportedNo verified 2026 returned-mail or in-person ballots for this state in the October 7 file. Nothing was imputed. Day-1 early vote is a signal, not a statewide margin. Applications and ballots that were only sent are not in this count. A day-1 pace gap is not a statewide margin.
- Model input
History block
R−D 7.5Weights 2018 5 / 2024 35 / 2020 20 / 2022 40. 2020 and 2022 results for this office are included in every state that had those races, including blowouts. A 2022 election is weighted ahead of 2018. If that office was not on the ballot, the 2020 result for the same office fills the year. Another office is not used. 2018 from 2020 R+38.4 w5, 2024 from 2020 R+38.4 w35, 2020 R+38.4 w20, 2022 R+44.0 w40. This is the last result for the office, not the presidential margin. A 2024 county map is not copied forward unchanged. A 2018 model error is not used.
- Model input
Electorate block
R−D 2.6History reweighted by usual midterm turnout, plus half of the transmitted swing. Rural and presidential-only counties still move farther when the result is spread back to counties. The 2026 early-vote count is not inside this margin.
- Model input
Turnout block
R−D 5.0Each county is weighted by its 2018 ballots divided by its 2024 presidential ballots. Small counties shrink halfway toward the state median. 2020 mail shares are not used. No verified 2026 returned-mail or in-person ballots for this state in the October 7 file. Nothing was imputed. Day-1 early vote is a signal, not a statewide margin.
- Model input
National environment
R−D 0.4History plus the full transmitted swing from the 60/40 national block.
- Model input
State environment
R−D 3.0History plus 45% of the transmitted swing.
- Model input
State partisan lean
R−D 13.3The 2024 presidential margin of this state, or of this district for a House race. It is heavier than the old state-environment block and is not shrunk toward the polling term.
- Model input
Trump popularity
R−D -5.1New York Times approval average, October 7, 2026: 37% approve, 60% disapprove. Net approval -23. That is not a vote share. Four-tenths of the net is a margin, then scaled by this place's partisan lean (factor 0.56), so an unpopular president costs more in a Democratic state.
- Model input
Candidate favorability
R−D 0.0Open seat or no incumbent. Favorability is zero.
- Model input
Demographics
R−D -0.7County college, rural, and nonwhite shares from the 2018 election-context file change how much of the swing a county takes. No separate microdata file.
- Model input
Finance
R−D 5.0No sourced spending edge, so the block starts on history. With a poll, it shrinks toward the polling term with the other non-poll blocks.
- Model input
Issues
R−D 5.0No sourced issue score. Same treatment as finance.
- Model input
Polling
R−D 0.6Individual polls -0.7 (80%) and the Wikipedia average -1.3 (20%). Named support R−D -1.1. Allocated support R−D -0.8. Named support does not move. Only the undecided line is split, 53.4% Republican and 46.6% Democratic. That is the 2024 two-party Republican share 56.7 moved halfway to 50 and capped at 60/40. A named third-party vote stays third-party. Banned individual rows excluded: 2. State miss shrunk 40% toward zero: 1.38. Public pollsters: 7. Outliers: 2. Recency half-life 16 days. Sample weight n/(n+350). A registered-voter poll is 0.90. An internal poll, or a poll sponsored by one party, is weighted 0.20, and only when a public poll is also in the race. An internal-only file is dropped. A poll that names both parties is not an internal. A poll more than 8 points from the median of the others is cut in half.
- Model input
Candidate
R+0.00 reaches the resultOpen seat. No incumbency term. A negative popularity score is not added on top of the office baseline. No overperformance. An open seat, a scandal, or a missing incumbent gets none.
- Model input
Halfway floor
AppliedPresidential margin 13.3. A thin poll may not move the result more than halfway from the office baseline 7.5 to the polling term. Held at 4.0. One poll does not rewrite the race.
- Model input
Pooling
35% of the way from each history block toward the polling termOtherwise the shrink is 35%.
- Model input
Prediction market
55% win probabilityAshley Hinson 55.0% is a win probability, not a vote share. Republican win probability 55.0 from Kalshi 55.0% Republican; Polymarket 55.0% Republican. A price of 50 is a tie. Each point above 50 is 0.35 margin points, capped at 12, so the raw margin is 1.8. That margin is shrunk 40% toward the pre-market margin 4.0, which leaves 2.7. It enters once, at 5.0%. The polling term is not nudged. Books under $10,000 and primary markets are ignored.
- Model input
State bend
R−D -2.8IA is adjusted 2.8 points toward the Democrats after the blend, from 3.9 to 1.1. Florida takes less of a Democratic national swing. Iowa, Wisconsin, and Arizona are not left pinned to a red presidential lean when the race is close. A seat already 15 points the other way, or a House seat whose own lines are 6 points that way and the race is already 4 points that way, only moves 1.2.
- Model input
Weights
polling 20.4% · history 7.4% · candidate 5.6% · electorate 4.7% · national 5.6% · stateEnv 3.7% · turnout 2.8% · demographics 2.8% · finance 1.9% · issues 1.9% · stateLean 16.8% · trump 11.2% · favorability 10.3% · market 5.0%History is lighter. State partisan lean, Trump popularity, and candidate favorability are their own terms. A market, when it qualifies, scales every other weight and is not taken out of polling alone.
County-sum margin
1.1This is the sum of the reporting units after each unit moved off its own history. It is not the poll average.
80% interval
-5.0 to 7.210th to 90th percentile of 50,000 draws. Poll, national, state, turnout, and candidate error.
95% interval
-8.2 to 10.42.5th to 97.5th percentile. Senate and governor state errors in the same state share a correlation of 0.30. The band shown is the marginal interval.
Wikipedia, 2026 United States Senate elections (general-election infobox, checked against the state narrative) sos.iowa.gov/elections/pdf/2020/general/canvsummary.pdf