Michigan
Governor
Open seat
Forecast as of October 7, 2026. These vote totals equal the sum of the counties below. Not a poll average.
DJocelyn Benson, DJocelyn Benson
Democratic
RJohn James, RJohn James
Republican
Other
Margin
D+6.9
Win probability
92.8%
80% interval
D+13.0 to D+0.8
95% interval
D+16.2 to R+2.4
Market
93%
Jocelyn Benson · win probability, not a vote shareRaw data Checking polls.
50,000 draws. The 80% interval is the 10th to the 90th percentile. The 95% interval is the 2.5th to the 97.5th. The thin mark is the 95% interval. The thick mark is the 80%. The hairline is zero. 4,250,585 ballots, equal to the table.
Counties
Every reporting unit in the race. Sort any column. The votes above are this table added up.
| Party | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wayne County | DJocelyn Benson, DJocelyn Benson | D | D+37.4 | 67.7% | 658,094 |
| Oakland County | DJocelyn Benson, DJocelyn Benson | D | D+17.2 | 57.6% | 593,113 |
| Macomb County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+4.5 | 51.3% | 391,129 |
| Kent County | DJocelyn Benson, DJocelyn Benson | D | D+10.2 | 54.1% | 285,610 |
| Genesee County | DJocelyn Benson, DJocelyn Benson | D | D+13.5 | 55.8% | 171,496 |
| Washtenaw County | DJocelyn Benson, DJocelyn Benson | D | D+49.9 | 74.0% | 170,037 |
| Ottawa County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+16.1 | 57.1% | 137,074 |
| Ingham County | DJocelyn Benson, DJocelyn Benson | D | D+36.7 | 67.4% | 113,724 |
| Kalamazoo County | DJocelyn Benson, DJocelyn Benson | D | D+23.4 | 60.7% | 111,906 |
| Livingston County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+17.2 | 57.6% | 101,730 |
| Saginaw County | DJocelyn Benson, DJocelyn Benson | D | D+4.5 | 51.3% | 79,783 |
| St. Clair County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+24.4 | 61.2% | 74,159 |
| Muskegon County | DJocelyn Benson, DJocelyn Benson | D | D+6.1 | 52.1% | 73,115 |
| Monroe County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+17.5 | 57.8% | 70,178 |
| Berrien County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+2.5 | 50.3% | 64,908 |
| Jackson County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+13.2 | 55.6% | 64,389 |
| Allegan County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+20.0 | 59.0% | 55,236 |
| Calhoun County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+6.2 | 52.1% | 52,624 |
| Eaton County | DJocelyn Benson, DJocelyn Benson | D | D+4.9 | 51.5% | 50,074 |
| Grand Traverse County | DJocelyn Benson, DJocelyn Benson | D | D+3.4 | 50.7% | 48,221 |
| Bay County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+5.4 | 51.7% | 47,123 |
| Lapeer County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+30.3 | 64.2% | 42,593 |
| Lenawee County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+14.6 | 56.3% | 42,268 |
| Midland County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+9.5 | 53.8% | 38,638 |
| Clinton County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+0.9 | 49.5% | 38,387 |
| Van Buren County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+7.4 | 52.7% | 31,627 |
| Shiawassee County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+13.3 | 55.7% | 31,258 |
| Marquette County | DJocelyn Benson, DJocelyn Benson | D | D+15.9 | 57.0% | 29,960 |
| Barry County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+25.7 | 61.9% | 29,674 |
| Montcalm County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+29.1 | 63.6% | 26,765 |
| Ionia County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+22.2 | 60.2% | 26,133 |
| Isabella County | DJocelyn Benson, DJocelyn Benson | D | D+1.1 | 49.6% | 23,678 |
| Tuscola County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+33.0 | 65.5% | 23,601 |
| St. Joseph County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+25.8 | 61.9% | 22,518 |
| Newaygo County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+34.2 | 66.1% | 22,434 |
| Cass County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+26.0 | 62.0% | 21,413 |
| Hillsdale County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+42.4 | 70.2% | 19,065 |
| Sanilac County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+38.5 | 68.3% | 17,932 |
| Emmet County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+5.4 | 51.7% | 17,555 |
| Mecosta County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+21.2 | 59.7% | 17,279 |
| Delta County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+21.0 | 59.5% | 16,807 |
| Houghton County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+8.6 | 53.3% | 11,903 |
| Branch County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+32.6 | 65.3% | 11,747 |
| Chippewa County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+14.7 | 56.4% | 11,287 |
| Mason County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+13.3 | 55.7% | 11,099 |
| Gratiot County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+20.6 | 59.3% | 11,056 |
| Leelanau County | DJocelyn Benson, DJocelyn Benson | D | D+12.7 | 55.4% | 10,867 |
| Charlevoix County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+10.3 | 54.2% | 10,855 |
| Wexford County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+26.1 | 62.1% | 10,849 |
| Huron County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+31.3 | 64.7% | 10,567 |
| Antrim County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+16.9 | 57.5% | 10,376 |
| Clare County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+27.7 | 62.9% | 9,630 |
| Alpena County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+18.7 | 58.4% | 9,587 |
| Manistee County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+7.4 | 52.7% | 9,402 |
| Cheboygan County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+22.5 | 60.3% | 9,148 |
| Roscommon County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+23.7 | 60.9% | 8,949 |
| Otsego County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+26.8 | 62.4% | 8,896 |
| Iosco County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+21.1 | 59.6% | 8,763 |
| Gladwin County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+30.1 | 64.1% | 8,628 |
| Dickinson County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+27.5 | 62.8% | 8,529 |
| Oceana County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+21.3 | 59.7% | 8,284 |
| Benzie County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+1.8 | 49.9% | 7,896 |
| Osceola County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+38.5 | 68.3% | 7,344 |
| Menominee County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+23.6 | 60.8% | 7,275 |
| Ogemaw County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+31.5 | 64.8% | 7,030 |
| Kalkaska County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+33.5 | 65.8% | 6,422 |
| Arenac County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+29.3 | 63.7% | 5,102 |
| Missaukee County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+47.0 | 72.5% | 5,098 |
| Gogebic County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+6.1 | 52.1% | 5,097 |
| Presque Isle County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+20.0 | 59.0% | 4,868 |
| Crawford County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+24.4 | 61.2% | 4,721 |
| Mackinac County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+16.9 | 57.5% | 4,449 |
| Alcona County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+31.8 | 64.9% | 4,167 |
| Iron County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+19.6 | 58.9% | 3,915 |
| Lake County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+22.3 | 60.2% | 3,852 |
| Montmorency County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+36.0 | 67.1% | 3,560 |
| Alger County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+10.2 | 54.1% | 3,232 |
| Oscoda County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+35.1 | 66.6% | 2,892 |
| Schoolcraft County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+22.2 | 60.1% | 2,728 |
| Baraga County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+20.1 | 59.1% | 2,414 |
| Ontonagon County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+20.7 | 59.4% | 2,140 |
| Luce County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+35.8 | 66.9% | 1,663 |
| Keweenaw County | RJohn James, RJohn James | R | R+6.4 | 52.2% | 990 |
Model
- Raw data
2024 presidential baseline
National R−D 1.5County presidential file. Not the 2026 result.
- Raw data
Generic ballot
D 50.8 R 42.6 R−D -8.2National Wikipedia aggregate, October 5, 2026. State generic ballots, where a public poll exists, replace a uniform national swing: ME, MI, NH, NY, OH. A state with no generic-ballot poll keeps the national number and is not assigned a neighbor's.
- Raw data
Party identification
Pew D+5 and Gallup D+10, blend R−D -7.3Pew NPORS 2026, identifiers plus leaners: Republican 43, Democratic 48. Gallup party identification plus leaners, first two quarters of 2026: Democratic 49, Republican 39. Pew is 55% of this blend and Gallup is 45%.
- Model input
National block
R−D -7.860% generic ballot and 40% party identification. The swing versus the 2024 presidential margin is what gets transmitted.
- Model input
Swing transmitted
0.40 × -9.3 = -3.7Only the share of the national swing this state took in the last midterm is transmitted. Elasticity is shrunk halfway toward 1.
- Raw data
2026 early vote
204,544 reported cast204,544 ballots reported cast as of 10/7/2026: 204,544 mail returned and 0 in person. Day-1 early vote is a signal, not a statewide margin. Mail is a count of returns, not the 2024 mail share. Applications and ballots that were only sent are not in this count. A day-1 pace gap is not a statewide margin.
- Model input
History block
R−D -5.4Weights 2018 5 / 2024 35 / 2020 20 / 2022 16. 2020 and 2022 results for this office are included in every state that had those races, including blowouts. A 2022 election is weighted ahead of 2018. If that office was not on the ballot, the 2020 result for the same office fills the year. Another office is not used. 2018 R+25.8 w5, 2022 open seat R+36.9 w16. No incumbent is on the ballot, so the 2022 result keeps 40 percent of its usual weight and 40 percent of its gap versus the 2024 presidential margin. The prior nominee's margin is not the open-seat baseline. This is the last result for the office, not the presidential margin. A 2024 county map is not copied forward unchanged. A 2018 model error is not used.
- Model input
Electorate block
R−D -9.3History reweighted by usual midterm turnout, plus half of the transmitted swing. Rural and presidential-only counties still move farther when the result is spread back to counties. Published ballots are the 2018 midterm canvass for this office, split by these modeled shares. They are not the 2024 presidential vote. The 2026 early-vote count is not inside this margin.
- Model input
Turnout block
R−D -8.1Each county is weighted by its 2018 ballots divided by its 2024 presidential ballots. Small counties shrink halfway toward the state median. 2020 mail shares are not used. 204,544 ballots reported cast as of 10/7/2026: 204,544 mail returned and 0 in person. Day-1 early vote is a signal, not a statewide margin. Mail is a count of returns, not the 2024 mail share.
- Model input
National environment
R−D -10.0History plus the full transmitted swing from the 60/40 national block.
- Model input
State environment
R−D -8.7History plus 45% of the transmitted swing.
- Model input
State partisan lean
R−D 1.4The 2024 presidential margin of this state, or of this district for a House race. It is heavier than the old state-environment block and is not shrunk toward the polling term.
- Model input
Trump popularity
R−D -8.8New York Times approval average, October 7, 2026: 37% approve, 60% disapprove. Net approval -23. That is not a vote share. Four-tenths of the net is a margin, then scaled by this place's partisan lean (factor 0.95), so an unpopular president costs more in a Democratic state.
- Model input
Candidate favorability
R−D 0.0Open seat or no incumbent. Favorability is zero.
- Model input
Demographics
R−D -10.7County college, rural, and nonwhite shares from the 2018 election-context file change how much of the swing a county takes. No separate microdata file.
- Model input
Finance
R−D -7.6No sourced spending edge, so the block starts on history. With a poll, it shrinks toward the polling term with the other non-poll blocks.
- Model input
Issues
R−D -7.6No sourced issue score. Same treatment as finance.
- Model input
Polling
R−D -11.7Individual polls -7.1 (80%) and the Wikipedia average -8.1 (20%). Named support R−D -7.4. Allocated support R−D -7.3. Named support does not move. Only the undecided line is split, 50.4% Republican and 49.6% Democratic. That is the 2024 two-party Republican share 50.7 moved halfway to 50 and capped at 60/40. A named third-party vote stays third-party. Banned individual rows excluded: 0. State miss shrunk 40% toward zero: -4.38. Public pollsters: 14. Outliers: 2. Recency half-life 16 days. Sample weight n/(n+350). A registered-voter poll is 0.90. An internal poll, or a poll sponsored by one party, is weighted 0.20, and only when a public poll is also in the race. An internal-only file is dropped. A poll that names both parties is not an internal. A poll more than 8 points from the median of the others is cut in half.
- Model input
Candidate
R+0.00 reaches the resultOpen seat. No incumbency term. A negative popularity score is not added on top of the office baseline. No overperformance. An open seat, a scandal, or a missing incumbent gets none.
- Model input
Halfway floor
Not appliedNot applied. The state's 2024 presidential margin was inside 10 points, or there is no polling term.
- Model input
Pooling
35% of the way from each history block toward the polling termOtherwise the shrink is 35%.
- Model input
Prediction market
93% win probabilityJocelyn Benson 93.2% is a win probability, not a vote share. Republican win probability 6.8 from Kalshi 7.3% Republican; Polymarket 6.2% Republican. A price of 50 is a tie. Each point above 50 is 0.35 margin points, capped at 12, so the raw margin is -12.0. That margin is shrunk 40% toward the pre-market margin -6.7, which leaves -9.9. It enters once, at 5.0%. The polling term is not nudged. Books under $10,000 and primary markets are ignored.
- Model input
State bend
NoneNot applied.
- Model input
Weights
polling 20.4% · history 7.5% · candidate 7.4% · electorate 4.7% · stateEnv 4.7% · national 4.7% · turnout 2.8% · demographics 2.8% · finance 1.9% · issues 1.9% · stateLean 14.9% · trump 11.2% · favorability 10.3% · market 5.0%History is lighter. State partisan lean, Trump popularity, and candidate favorability are their own terms. A market, when it qualifies, scales every other weight and is not taken out of polling alone.
County-sum margin
-6.9This is the sum of the reporting units after each unit moved off its own history. It is not the poll average.
80% interval
-13.0 to -0.810th to 90th percentile of 50,000 draws. Poll, national, state, turnout, and candidate error.
95% interval
-16.2 to 2.42.5th to 97.5th percentile. Senate and governor state errors in the same state share a correlation of 0.30. The band shown is the marginal interval.
Wikipedia, 2026 United States gubernatorial elections (general-election infobox) www.wilx.com/2025/01/22/report-secretary-state-jocelyn-benson-accidentally-announces-run-governor/